Review Nike Zoom Fly Flyknit
We spent 6.9 hours reading reviews from experts and users. In summary, this is what runners think:
6 reasons to buy
– Many people stated that the midsole unit of the Nike Zoom Fly Flyknit was highly responsive to their movements.
– The carbon fiber plate integrated into the midsole gained some fans as it apparently helped in making each step as springy as possible.
– The Flyknit upper was considered by most consumers as one of the best cover systems in the market because it secured the foot in a lightweight and breathable wrap.
– Several runners were happy that this shoe accommodated their sizing expectations.
– Purchasers have lauded the aesthetics of the Nike Zoom Fly Flyknit, stating that its looks were visually striking.
– This shoe just felt fast, according to more than a handful of users.
4 reasons not to buy
– Some people complained that the outsole unit already started to wear off after only a few uses.
– Several individuals noted that this shoe’s profile was heavy for their tastes, emphasizing that it didn’t allow them to wear it for very long.
– The removable nature of the insole caused it to shift around irritatingly, a few testers observed.
– The collar tended to rub against the ankles, causing discomfort, according to some consumers.
The Nike Zoom Fly Flyknit offered a lot when it comes to responsive performance on the roads. People were generally happy with the touted younger brother of the Vaporfly 4%. They welcomed the fresh looks, the fast heel-to-transitions, the high-quality midsole, and the breathable Flyknit upper. On the other hand, there were those who complained that the weight of this road shoe was more substantial than they anticipated; others weren’t happy with the easy-to-wear-off outsole and the way the collar chafed the ankles irritatingly.